Three Pigs Corporation Essay Example for Free

tether Pigs Corporation Es order* Relevant Facts1. There be essentially three major categories of snaffle size uplive hogs ready for sale, developing animals, and processed pork barrel products. 2. Not all live hogs in other locations that can non be easily transported and processed at the Companys main process plants. As a result, these live hogs must be sold to third parties at spot securities industry prices. 3. There are several factors, including increased supply of pork due to the capture of the Big Bad Wolf, pee-pee run low to the declining prices for their live hog on the spot market. * Solution AnalysisComplying with the periodicity assumption and the conservative principle, grade inventories down leave alone better speculate the value of the scrutinize.There are several parts mentioned the document mischief in ARB43, Ch.4 Par.9The rule of cost or market whichever is lower is int reverseed to provide a means of measuring the remaining usefulness of an chr onicle exp finishiture.Inventory losses from market declines should not be deferred beyond the interim period in which the decline occurs.There are four alternatives to deal with this archive case of the Company.i) low the lower of cost or market method on a count inventory basis GAAP requires that the inventory be written down to the lower of cost or market when substantial evidence exists that market prices will recover earlier the inventory is sold. A get down is generally required unless the decline is due to seasonal price fluctuations (FASB Cod. 270-10-45-6).In this case, if it can be decided that the future prices for lean hogs decline only for a acting(prenominal) period and will recover before the end of the monetary year, the inventory could be record on a total inventory basis.However, IRS regulations say the types of items to be included in the same pool should be substantially similar. It seems that the three major categories of hog inventory are quite differen t products. It is not appropriate enough to put all of them into a single pool.ii) Under the lower of cost or market method based on end product kinspersonThe method that marking down only live hogs that cannot be processed into pork products seems to be reasonable to some extents. The live hogs processing at the Companys main processing plants do not need to make cost adjustment because the spot market does not yarn-dye their price while the other hogs that cannot be processed have to be marked down to shine the value.ARB43, Ch.4 Par.11 If there is only one end-product category the cost utility of the total stockThe inventory in its entiretymay have the greatest significance for accounting purposes.However, there are three categories in this case. And the developing animals and live hogs to be processed internally and to be sold to third parties are not different in nature. eve though they will be with different price because of the different processed method, it is not appropr iate to evaluate them separately.iii) Under the lower of cost or market method on an individual basis to the extent possibleAlthough there are some advantages to evaluate at the individual level, such as accuracy, it is not a practical way. Firstly, the specific identification method may be practical only in a few situations in which units are costly and can be easily distinguished. The cost of each(prenominal) individual is not identifiable in this kind of complex manufacturing and retailing situation. Secondly, the method may run too expensive to use as the increase of the volume and the cost of record keeping. Thirdly, the amount of pull in varies even though the units of inventory are identical.The ability of earnings management is not allowed under GAAP.iv) Under the lower of cost or market method by inventory categoryTo evaluate the impairment of inventory under the lower of cost or market method by inventory category seems to be the most practical and reasonable method in this case.The lower of cost or market method is accurate only if the goods in the inventory are perfectly homogeneous. The Companys inventory of three categories meets this criterion here. Markups and markdowns do not exist at the same time and all the marked-down items will be sold by the end of this fiscal year.* ConclusionMy recommendation is that all hogs are impaired and can be marked down to reflect the value using the LCM by inventory category. Based on the analysis above, this seems to be the most appropriate method that would most accurately reflect the intent of US GAAP.* Interim reportingInterim financial information is essential to provide investors and others with timely information as to the progress of the entity. However, GAAP states clearly that temporary market declines need not be recognized at the interim date since no loss is expected to incur in the fiscal year. If the company recognizes a decline and then reverses it in a later interim period, it should rec ognize a loss recovery and increase the inventory value by the amount of the recovery, but only up to the original cost (FASB Cod. 270-10-45).In this case, the inventory price is expected to be recovered by the end of this fiscal year and should be sufficient to recover the cost of the Companys inventory. Such temporary declines do not need to report in the interim report.