Title Barchester Towers

throw everywhereboard me to quote Dr. Grantlys statework forcet on honest men squabbling for money. This is wretched since in the light of this question and in reference to the context of the floor of the question in question, the bicker for money and forcefulness involves men of God. perform men who are believed by musical compositiony tidy sum and more curiously the clergys converts to be the great unwashed of sexual morality and honest. The contrary is that, they are the ones complex in this conflict of the press to ascend to the lead of the diocese in question.I totally concor with Dr.Grantlys opinion and so as Trollopes endorsement. The squabble amongst the clergy men in the church bestrays the very trust bestowed to men of church building by the social club. The church should be the center of peace order and honesty. eitherthing in brief of this is the very opposite of the demeanor things should happen. OTHER AMBITIONS Apart from the squabbling for the Churc h leadership, on that point is also rivalry for the control of Hirams hospital. The emulations Mr. Hope does non only foot race much of the proudies official businesses tho also aspire to take over the Hirams hospital.This is a show of selfishness since he wants to grab anything at his disposal. He upgrade goes ahead to Marry non necessarily to suck in a family precisely the rich lady who will bring wealth to him. This is what we call travel in love in disguise for his love with lady he married lands him into scandals until his undoing restores peace among the concourse in the diocese. The inhalation is to attach someone is encouraged if it is not motivated by other uteria motives. The ambition of ascending to power is also positive since if the earth lacked ambition people, it would not produce its leaders.Any one will approve of positive ambition. Grantlys ambition to take over leadership of the Church is acceptable before the eyeball of people who are for the trut h and nicety. The appointment of proudies is a disappointment to the people who are for the truth. The war of ideas betwixt Mr. heel over and his rivals on who has the right to fountain Hirams hospital is an sour of selfishness and shame in the Church and the society as a whole. In this case who is who is not what matters, what matters is who is just. THE HONEST MANThe honest man in the Barchester tower is Archdeacon Grantly . According to Trollope, he is the per male child who by the virtue of the tradition of the church, he is the heir and the next to take over the leadership of the diocese if everything were to go as stipulated by the right of the Church. The contrast comes when Mr. Proudies is brought in by the Government to ran the affairs of the Church. It is also sad to learn that there are other people who control the state of affairs in the Church and he is only there as a cracking-for-nothing stamp.The above example is one of the many leaders in the gentlemans gen tleman who own their political offices not because the quality to own or ran them just because they are puppets of some wellhead connected power brokers. A good example are Mr. face and Mrs. Proudie. Mr. Proudie is un worryly to deliver since his service essential be directed to his proxys, political God finds and mother. Another negative position of this kind of a leader is that, he might be installed in an office which he is not experienced to run which might inhabit. This pitching of required of him by the society concerned.Honest people are the least touristy with the mass. This is because he may not agree with the view of the majority behavioural aspect that might make him popular. This very sad, since Grantly should break been the right natural selection for the post of the Bishop only he lost it to proudie since he was not well connected with the politicians. This could have been simply due to his stand on justice and world fair to all which is what the corrupt pe ople would not accept. whence if this is the case, do we allow corrupt people control and rule the world? moreover, we cannot give all the credit to Mr.Grantly since his own weakness. As a parole of Bishop he grew up with the opinion that he has the monopoly of knowledge as pertains to a running of church affairs, now that he is a heir to his father Bishop his strong opinion are unbending attitude makes him a materialistic and a figure representing the Church traditions. He miscarrys to understand world keeps on changing and she should accept to change with it, and that he lived in a society that is dynamic. For that reason he is resemblingly to fall out with people who have modern ideas like Mr.Slope and the sister in- law Eleanor B elderly. CHARACTER The character of Mr. Slope and Mr. Arabins desires for the worldly comforts is portrayed negatively. Meangiful comfort can only be realized once someone acquires wealth out of his own sweating. Any short cut or unwanted inherit ance as of Eleanors case does not guarantee comfort since the consequences haunts the person concern since ones sense of right and wrong will also remind the person concerned of the unfair shipway he dreprived the person of his rights e. g. inheritance. How ever, Mr. Hardings refusal to take over of the deanery is reasonable.This is because being a righteous person would not accept to the touch based with corrupt people in the Church. He is also aware of the external political forces running the Church and as such he fears to be compelled to do what he knows its not right before the eyes of God and men. So the semblanceship between the honest and the sloshed is bad as expected. There is no way a honest person will share and agree with the wicked. However we can not deny the fact Dr. Hardings is the Father in law to Mr. Grantly and there is no doubt that he shares the same segment with his son in law Mr. Grantly.We can enounce that he is also a ultraconservative. We can not also rule out his opposition to the trade union of his daughter Eleanor Bold to Mr. Slope. The fact that Mr. Slope is a close associate of Mr. Proudie who is now the current Bishop and Mrs. Proudie whom they share ideas and house, it is apparent that the two parties have antithetic attitudes towards each other. Grantlys attitudes towards Eleanor Bold his sister in law and Mr. Slope are extreme and rigid. He is a one man who would not admit mistakes and he looks at other people as being on the wrong him right. That is why on the other hand Mr.Slope and his associates calculate Mr. Grantly as old , out dated old fashioned conservative The honest person will want to use a slip by way that would be approved by the men of justice. A wicked person on the contrary, cares not what people would think or advance about him but its achievements. It doesnt matter to him that in the course of go through towards the achievements of its goals, someone was hurt on the way or not provided he a chieves what he wanted. Thats why the likely of Grantly and other honest people in the church do feature much in the struggle for possession of power.Thats why the author Trollope write to side with Mr. Grant. pack like Mr. Slope, Mr. Arabin are driven by a burning desire of the worldly posses for the worldly possession and comforts, and thats why their ends is a gargantuan disgrace to them and their families. A good name is better than wealth something they fail to understand and history will judge them. The white people say that Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely so the coming in of the politicians in the said squabble for money in the Church not only indoctrinate the politicians but also the church men like Mr.Slope. Charlotte, Stanhope and Madeleine Neronis to Berties situation is another very amusing act of people who are acting in the middle of a openhanded controversy . The two characters are close associates of Bertie yet their approach to us are probl ems leaves a lot to be desired. CONCLUSION In relation to the Church situation today and in reference to the character mentioned precedent in the analysis, it is apparent that the uprightness is lacking the Church and the struggle for power has killed the very trust the church used to enjoy in the away .There are a few honest men and women in Church, but the majority are people out to achieve their ambitions gains. Let the Church stands its ground and route not this vice if it hopes to restore its lost Glory. The giving medication also should keep off the affairs of the Church. A church is a define place with the obligation of providing for refuge and consolation of the heartbroken but not a den of thieves as Jesus puts it when he met people doing business in the Solomons temple in Jesuralem. Opportunists should also not seek their lack in the Church as with some of the clergy men today.However when the old fashioned clergy men like Mr. Grantly becomes so rigid with the old ideas , conflicts in the Church from the young generation are eminent . So anything good pertaining to the history and the tradition of the Church should be passed on to the innovative generation with caution and wisdom. Therefore it is seems apparent that somehow Mr. Grantly and the like in the Church should seek for dialogue if the Church glory has to be maintained. such weaknesses as with the clergy today gives room to the young invading the church and overturning the tablesThey go to work in the Church not with a call to administer the people of God but to earn for their living just like people in any other business. Such people have destroyed the good reputation of the Church. The government and politicians should be warned not delve their noses in the Church affairs least God will revenge them for interfering with and destroying the directions and good name of the Church. The two cant be married let the church be left to the clergy and politics and to the politicians. exit CIT ED. ? Barchester Towers by Trollope 1847 ? The writers collections experience